Is Nike Too Big to Fail, Reputation-Wise?
It’s been a tough year for Nike. Spokesperson problems with Tiger Woods and LeBron James. Continued investigations into labor conditions in Nike factories abroad. Competition like the new Reebok Zig. And now, a stupid legal maneuver that could spell PR disaster.
Brands are forever trying to find ways to stop the Canal Street cottage industry of counterfeiters. (You know you’ve made it when they are selling your knock offs on a street corner). I get it. But Nike has taken anti-counterfeiting to a whole new level by litigating against an individual who bought a single pair of counterfeit sneakers online. They aren’t going after the website selling counterfeit sneakers, or the supplier who sold them to the website. So this poor customer not only paid for fake sneakers, he bought himself a lawsuit, too.
And while the statute says that the intent of the purchaser isn’t relevant, success in this case for Nike is the equivalent of convicting Al Capone on tax evasion or mail fraud, rather than racketeering. Does Nike really want to discourage us from buying their sneakers? Or has their seemingly bulletproof status, weathering spokesperson issues of gargantuan proportions, given them the sort of reputational hubris that makes them an easy target for consumer activism in 2011?
No one likes when the big corporation goes after the little guy. The question is will enough little guys notice this case, and take some sort of action, to make a difference?

