Is it NFL fans & not the players who need union representation?
This update on the collective bargaining agreement in the NFL caught my eye. I’ve had many a debate with my husband, a union lobbyist, about whether organized labor is really necessary in our modern workplace.
Unions were born out of a need to protect workers who could not protect and advocate for themselves in a time when job mobility was scarce and the notion of commuting the distances many of us commute would have been considered absurd. You lived in a steel town, a lumber town, an automotive town and if working conditions were bad at your local industry, you were SOL.
Even I would admit that situations exist where a union adds real value. Consider the safety training given to a crane operator from the union before operating a crane high above a busy city street. Or a workplace environment where uneducated workers with limited English are easy targets for abuse.
However, the NFL fails to qualify on either of those fronts or many others. These men make millions of dollars for playing a game and, depending on your team of choice, sometimes not even playing very well. They have the financial means to secure representation by a whole fleet of agents, professional legal advisors, medical experts, physical therapists, personal trainers, publicists, image consultants, and more. Do they real need representation to negotiate the terms of their collective employment? I don’t think so.
One party is noticeably lacking in representation in the discussions about player salaries, building new stadiums and deciding a number of games, and that’s us, the fans. Perhaps we’re the ones who need representation. After all, who gets left holding the bag in the form of sky high ticket prices, outrageously priced licensed apparel, and the requirement to buy the NFL Sunday Ticket to watch their favorite teams?





The new season of 

